參考文獻
[1]Arkes, H. R., & Mellers, B. A. (2002). Do juries meet our expectations? Law and Human Behavior, 26(6), 625.
[2]Lee, H. (1990). To kill a mockingbird. Litigation, 68-58.
[3]Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63-67.
[4]Kalven, H., Zeisel, H., Callahan, T., & Ennis, P. (1966). The american jury: Little, Brown Boston.其實這個研究也進一步的去談到，在證據清楚的情況下，陪審團與法官的意見也比較容易一致。當然這個研究比較古老（經典），所以後續也有其他研究進行檢驗，並且認為需要考量更多因素[5]。
[5]Gastwirth, J. L., & Sinclair, M. D. (2004). A re-examination of the 1966 Kalven–Zeisel study of judge–jury agreements and disagreements and their causes. Law, Probability and Risk, 3(3-4), 169-191.
[6]Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (2000). 13 Explanation-Based Decision Making. Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader, 212.
[7]海苔熊. (2015, February 7). 人為疏失還是機械故障？你怎麼想，決定你對鬼島的希望. PanSci 泛科學. Retrieved March 8, 2018 from pansci.asia/archives/75027
[8] Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 521.
[9]Aronson, E.、Wilson, T. D.、Akert, R. M.（2015）。Social Psychology（余伯泉、陳舜文、危芷芬與李茂興譯）（第8版）。台灣：揚智文化。
*本文為泛科學與法律白話文運動合作之文章
文/海苔熊
本文經授權取自法律白話文運動（原標題：國民法官真的靠譜嗎？從心理學角度談國民法官與法庭的互動）
責任編輯/潘渝霈
